Professor Steinmueller has been Professorial fellow at SPRU since 1997. He began his studies in the areas of computer science, mathematics, economics, and Chinese language and history at the University of Oregon and Stanford University. At Stanford (1974-1994), he was engaged in teaching, research, consulting while being a Deputy Director of what is now the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. He was selected for a chair at MERIT at the University of Maastricht, The Netherlands where he developed a Doctoral training school prior to SPRU. Steinmueller has published widely in the field of the industrial economics of information and communication technology industries including integrated circuits, computers, telecommunications, software and the economic, social policy issues of the Information Society. He has also contributed to research in science policy and the economics of basic research. Steinmueller co-authored ‘Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change’ published in Research Policy (open access) with Johan Schot which was the academic foundation for launching TIPC. Since then, he has contributed to the ‘training’ component of TIPC with the design of learning resources and sessions. He is also involved in TIPC research that aims to understand the benefits and limitations of the methods TIPC employs in attempting to catalyse transformative change.
在 TIPC 中的作用: TIPC Lead Researcher & Co-author of founding paper 3 Frames Paper


The 4th Industrial Revolution: A Packaging of Transformative Change?



科技创新对历史发展的影响。在现有创新政策的讨论中,可以自主出有两个主导且存的创新政策框架。第一个是决策政策后政府对科学和研究的支持,其假设第二个框架兴起于 2080 年代,其能促进增长且能够解决现实问题对新欠缺动力的市场灵性。 )的知识创造和商业化。科技创新政策着眼于联系,群体和网络,促进系统内各种元素之间的联系和学习,并且能够实现思想精神。第三框架联系到现在的社会和环境挑战,例如可持续发展目标以及对转型创新需求之后的社会框架的区别。转型主要指可持续发展研究领域的基础技术系统。本文对框架3的。特征进行了描述,且为视角对前两个框架的特征。框架3的主要特征是对试验的关注,主要论点是南半球爱情追赶北半球发展的模式。本文认为。框架对政策制定的指导都十分,但应给予开拓创新政策的优先级。 关键词:转型;可持续发展目标;研究;国家创新系统;创新政策...

COVID-19 对政策学习和共同创造意味着什么?

Vicky Shaw and Ed Steinmueller of the Transformative Innovation Policy Consortium consider the need to rethink business-as-usual and experiment with new ways of working. Learning and co-creation are the foundation for TIPC’s work on research, experimentation and evaluation. The consortium...